Join the Roundtable on Sustainable Forests Webinars

The Forest Service is working with scientists from around the country to compile and analyze data for the National Report on Sustainable Forests. This report is the review from the United States on how the Nation’s forests are doing based on the 7 Criteria and 54 Indicators for Sustainable Forests put forth by the Montreal Process. (Credit: Dandog77,

Before the review draft is even released, YOU have the opportunity to attend a series of webinars presented by national leaders for each criterion section, as well as to hear from Dr. Guy Robertson, the editor of the National Report.

Participating in these webinars will allow you to achieve the following:

  • Learn about the indicators that help us understand how our forests are doing for each criterion.
  • Discover the initial findings that researchers are seeing as they evaluate the last 5 years of data since the 2010 report.
  • Discuss with the lead researchers of each criterion what they’re finding and what it means.
  • Help shape the conclusions and perspectives presented in the final report.

Each 60-minute webinar provides an initial glimpse into the data while highlighting topics for conversation on the Sustainable Forests Roundtable site and on social media, including the Sustainable Forests Roundtable Dialog on Facebook.

We invite you to take this opportunity to have a “sneak preview” of data from the upcoming National Report on Sustainable Forests. The criteria leads for each of the seven criteria (including Forest Products Laboratory economist Ted Bilek) will be presenting on the data they are collecting, and share initial interesting results they are finding. It will also be an opportunity to give feedback and reflect on each criterion and the indicators that relate to it–feedback that will then be used to help determine the content of the final report.

To learn more and register for webinars, visit the Roundtable on Sustainable Forests Webinar webpage.

About the Report

The National Report on Sustainable Forests provides a comprehensive assessment of forests in the United States across the ecological, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability. Close to 30 Forest Service scientists and university collaborators are contributing to the 2015 edition of the report. Other forestry professionals and concerned individuals are helping to inform the National Report through their ongoing participation in the Sustainable Forest Roundtable, a national, open-membership stakeholder group devoted to promoting sustainable forest reporting and management in the United States.

Using the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators for Forest Sustainability as a foundation, the National Report combines summary analysis with hard data on specific aspects of forest ecosystems, data on topics such as forest area and biodiversity measures, forest carbon sequestration, the social and economic benefits supplied by forests, and the institutions through which we manage them. In fact, one of the main purposes of the National Report is to make these data as accessible as possible so that people can come to their own conclusions about forest conditions and sustainability.

Updating Building Design Software to Quantify Environmental Impacts

With continuously growing interest in green building, it is important for building designers to consider the environmental impacts of their designs. Unfortunately, no building design software currently offers a way to quantify those impacts for building structures with wood.


Software changes will allow building designers to compare the environmental impact of wood products with non-wood materials.

Richard Bergman, a research forest products technologist at the Forest Products Laboratory, is working to incorporate whole-building life-cycle assessment (LCA) data in design software so the impacts of building with wood can be quantified and points can be gathered toward green building certification.

A substantial body of wood product LCA data has been developed in the past 15 years for North America, however its greatest impact in the marketplace will likely come with its inclusion in building design software.

Results from this project will allow building designers to make on-demand environmental performance comparisons of building made with wood and non-wood building materials.

For more information, please see this Research in Progress report.

This project is conducted in cooperation with the American Wood Council.

New Research Shows Markets and Timing Matter When Accounting for Biogenic Carbon

The Society of American Foresters (SAF) has published “Forest Carbon Accounting Considerations in US Bioenergy Policy” in the Journal of Forestry. The article, which was authored by an SAF-sponsored team comprised of some of the US’s leading forest carbon experts (including FPL Research Forester Ken Skog), identifies and examines scientific-based insights essential to understanding forest bioenergy and “carbon debts.”


FPL’s Ken Skog is an author on the Journal of Forestry article.

As noted by Reid Miner, the lead author and chair of the SAF team, the article’s insights, which are built on a comprehensive review of the most current literature, illustrate why quantifying the full spectrum of forest-based activities is critical when accounting for biogenic carbon and carbon dioxide, and why policymakers should consider that:

– Even while the greenhouse-gas benefits of sustainable forest biomass energy are sometimes delayed, it is well established that these benefits are substantial over the long term.

– The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reported that peak global temperature is likely to be determined by long-term cumulative CO2 emissions, and that forest-based energy and products help limit cumulative CO2 emissions.

– An accurate comparison of the carbon impacts of forest biomass energy with those of other energy sources requires the use of consistent timeframes in the comparison.

– Landowner responses to increased wood demand can have a significant influence on the carbon impacts of forest biomass energy.

The release of this article comes as a number of groups await the Environmental Protection Agency’s Carbon Accounting Framework for Biogenic Carbon Emissions, following a three-year deferral to examine the issue. Dr. Roger Sedjo, a member of both the SAF team and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science Advisory Board (SAB) said, “I was concerned about the complexity of the SAB recommendations that resulted from our discussions, and was also uncertain whether the SAB process captured the importance of market dynamics, including the effects of markets on forest investment levels. The magnitude and timing of benefits from use of forest bioenergy depends upon availability of markets for wood products. This article clearly shows how influential markets are as we consider how forest biomass factors into our energy future.” Sedjo also noted that timing of carbon benefits is often misrepresented in current literature—something that is also addressed in this article.

University of Washington scientist Dr. Elaine Oneil added, “In the West, reducing forest biomass density is an effective means of stemming the threat of large-scale intensive wildfires. Generally, the non-merchantable residues from thinning projects are burned on site to reduce fire risk and improve forest health. Utilizing residues to produce biomass energy, instead of burning them in the forest, returns carbon to the atmosphere at the same time as burning residues on site without energy recovery, so the net impact of energy production on biogenic carbon emissions is essentially zero and the benefits from using residues for energy are immediate. However, these benefits are not possible without markets for these residues.”

North Carolina State Professor Dr. Robert Abt was impressed by the SAF team’s work, which represents different disciplines and regions of the country. “The study provides a comprehensive review of the science surrounding wood bioenergy and carbon emissions. Unlike many discussions, it recognizes the economic relationships among wood bioenergy uses, forest harvests, and forest investments by providing a review of both the theoretical rationale and the empirical evidence of the effect of an increase in wood demand on forest carbon. The literature demonstrates that increased demand for wood bioenergy can lead not only to increased harvests, but also to increased forest investments, which provide offsetting forest growth and associated offsetting increases in forest carbon.”

FPL to Play Key Role in Innovative Biomass Research: $5.8 Million Federal Grant Awarded to Humboldt State University

Humboldt State University (HSU), along with 15 regional partners including the Forest Products Laboratory, has received a $5.88 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy to conduct innovative biomass research.

The grant is part of the Biomass Research and Development Initiative, a collaborative effort between the Department of Energy and the Department of Agriculture that supports renewable energy research in the rural United States.

FPL economist Ted Bilek will lead the economic life cycle analysis group.

Under the grant, a team of scholars, industry partners and forestland managers led by HSU forestry professor Han-Sup Han will build on existing research for converting forest residues into renewable fuel and other valuable bio-based products. Forest residues include limbs, treetops and other materials left on the forest floor after timber harvesting. Often considered waste material and not effectively used, forest residues are an undervalued source of potential bioenergy. Strategic use of woody biomass has the potential to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and promote economic development in rural America.

The grant will allow research teams comprising investigators, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, and private sector partners to address technical challenges and make bioenergy technologies more marketable. The three research areas will be feedstock (processed forest residues) supply, mobile conversion technologies, and economic life-cycle analysis.

Ted Bilek, an economist at the Forest Products Laboratory, will lead the economic life-cycle analysis group. Bilek’s team will conduct a life-cycle analysis documenting the economic benefits and other environmental effects related to using forest residues.

“It’s not enough that the technologies work and produce energy,” Bilek says. “They also need to be economically viable, socially acceptable, and environmentally sustainable. These are the focuses of our group. Our research will also help to highlight areas that offer the greatest potentials to improve returns and to ensure long-term sustainability.”

The grant is titled Waste to Wisdom: Utilizing forest residues for the production of bioenergy and bioproducts. Research partners include: Green Diamond Resource Company, the University of Washington, Oregon State University, the Bureau of Land Management, USDA Forest Service, USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, USFS Forest Products Lab, Redwood Forest Foundation, Forest Concepts LLC, Steve Morris Logging, Peterson Pacific Corp., Biochar Solutions Inc., Pellet Fuels Institute and the Forest Business Network LLC.

Timber Markets by the Numbers

ByTheNumbersWe just love, love, love the numbers here at FPL. None more than the men and women of the Economics, Statistics, and Life Cycle Analysis Research group.

Publicly available data sets cover U.S. timber production, trade, consumption, and price statistics, 1965 to 2011; and industrial wood productivity in the United States, 1900-1998.

U.S. Timber Production, Trade, Consumption and Price Statistics 1965-2011 (FPL-RP-676) was produced by James Howard and Rebecca Westby and published in 2013. Individual data sets for this publication include general economic trends and specific details on roundwood, logs, pulpwood, paperboard, particleboard, wood pulp production, wood energy use, and more. It’s precursor, U.S. Timber Production, Trade, Consumption, and Price Statistics 1965 to 2005 (FPL-RP-637) was produced by James Howard and published in 2007.

Industrial Wood Productivity in the United States, 1900-1998 (FPL-RN-0271), was authored by Peter Ince and published in 2000.